Secretaries of state after Brezhnev. Was Stalin General Secretary
On April 3, 1922, a seemingly ordinary event occurred. The General Secretary of the Central Committee of the RCP (b) was elected. But this event changed the course of the history of Soviet Russia. On this day he was appointed to this post. Lenin by that time was already seriously ill, and Joseph Stalin tried by hook or by crook to gain a foothold in his post. Was not in the party consensus about what to do next. The revolution won, power strengthened. And then what? Some said that it was necessary to stimulate the World Revolution in every possible way, others said that socialism can win in one particular country and therefore it is not at all necessary to fan the global fire. The new Secretary General took advantage of the disagreement in the party and, having gained practically unlimited power into his hands, began to gradually clear the way for himself to dominate the huge power. He ruthlessly eliminated political opponents, and soon there was no one left capable of objecting to him.
The period of Joseph Stalin's reign is a huge layer of our history. He stood at the helm for 30 long years. And what years? What has not happened in our history over the years? And the restoration of the economy after the anarchy of the civil war. And giant construction sites. And the threat of enslavement in World War II, and new buildings in the post-war years. And this all fit into these thirty years of Stalin’s rule. A whole generation of people grew up under him. These years are all exploring and researching. You can have different attitudes towards Stalin’s personality, his cruelty, and the tragedy of the country. But this is our story. And our great-grandmothers and great-grandfathers in old photographs, for the most part, still do not seem unhappy.
WAS THERE AN ALTERNATIVE?
Stalin's election as General Secretary occurred after the XI Congress (March - April 1922), in which Lenin, for health reasons, took only a fragmentary part (he was present at four of the twelve meetings of the congress). “When at the 11th Congress... Zinoviev and his closest friends nominated Stalin for General Secretary, with the ulterior motive of using his hostile attitude towards me,” Trotsky recalled, “Lenin, in a close circle objecting to the appointment of Stalin as General Secretary, made his famous phrase: “I don’t recommend it, this cook will only cook spicy dishes”... However, the Petrograd delegation led by Zinoviev won at the congress. The victory was all the easier for her because Lenin did not accept the battle. He did not carry his resistance to Stalin's candidacy to the end only because the post of secretary had a completely subordinate importance in the conditions of that time. He (Lenin) himself did not want to attach exaggerated significance to his warning: while the old Politburo remained in power, general secretary could only be a subordinate figure."
Having arrived at the post of General Secretary, Stalin immediately began to widely use methods of selecting and appointing personnel through the Secretariat of the Central Committee and the Accounting and Distribution Department of the Central Committee subordinate to it. Already in the first year of Stalin’s activity as Secretary General, the Uchraspred made about 4,750 appointments to responsible positions.
At the same time, Stalin, together with Zinoviev and Kamenev, began to rapidly expand the material privileges of the party’s leadership. At the XII Party Conference, held during Lenin’s illness (August 1922), for the first time in the history of the party, a document was adopted that legitimized these privileges. We are talking about the resolution of the conference “On financial situation active party workers”, which clearly defined the number of “active party workers” (15,325 people) and introduced a strict hierarchization of their distribution into six categories. Members of the Central Committee and Central Control Commission, heads of departments of the Central Committee, members of regional bureaus of the Central Committee and secretaries of regional and provincial committees were to be paid at the highest level. At the same time, the possibility of a personal increase in their salaries was agreed upon. In addition to high wages, all specified workers had to be “provided with housing (through local executive committees), in relation medical care(through the People's Commissariat for Health), in relation to the upbringing and education of children (through the People's Commissariat for Education),” and the corresponding additional natural benefits were to be paid for from the party fund.
Trotsky emphasized that already during Lenin’s illness, Stalin increasingly acted “as an organizer and educator of the bureaucracy, and most importantly: as a distributor of earthly goods.” This period coincided with the end of the bivouac situation during the Civil War. “The more sedentary and balanced life of the bureaucracy gives rise to the need for comfort. Stalin, who himself continues to live relatively modestly, at least since outside, masters this movement towards comfort, he distributes the most profitable posts, he selects the top people, rewards them, he helps them increase their privileged position.”
These actions of Stalin responded to the desire of the bureaucracy to throw off the harsh control in the field of morality and personal life, the need for which was mentioned by numerous party decisions of the Leninist period. The bureaucracy, increasingly embracing the prospect of personal well-being and comfort, “respected Lenin, but felt too much of his puritanical hand. She was looking for a leader in her own image and likeness, first among equals. They said about Stalin... “We are not afraid of Stalin. If he starts to get arrogant, we’ll remove him.” A turning point in the living conditions of the bureaucracy occurred since Lenin’s last illness and the beginning of the campaign against “Trotskyism.” In every political struggle on a large scale, one can eventually open the question of steak.”
Stalin's most provocative actions to create illegal and secret privileges for the bureaucracy at that time still met resistance from his allies. Thus, after the adoption of a Politburo resolution in July 1923 to make it easier for the children of senior officials to enter universities, Zinoviev and Bukharin, who were on vacation in Kislovodsk, condemned this decision, saying that “such a privilege will close the way for the more talented and introduce elements of caste. No good."
Compliance to privileges, the willingness to take them for granted meant the first round in the everyday and moral degeneration of the partyocracy, which was inevitably to be followed by a political degeneration: the willingness to sacrifice ideas and principles for the sake of preserving one’s posts and privileges. “The ties of revolutionary solidarity that embraced the party as a whole were replaced to a large extent by ties of bureaucratic and material dependence. Previously, it was only possible to win supporters with ideas. Now many have begun to learn how to win supporters with positions and material privileges.”
These processes contributed to the rapid growth of bureaucracy and intrigue in the party and state apparatus, which Lenin, who returned to work in October 1922, was literally shocked by. In addition, as Trotsky recalled, “Lenin sensed that, in connection with his illness, almost elusive threads of a conspiracy were woven behind him and behind me. The Epigones have not yet burned bridges or blown them up. But in some places they were already sawing down beams, in some places they were quietly placing pyroxylin blocks... Going into work and noting with increasing anxiety the changes that had taken place over ten months, Lenin for the time being did not mention them out loud, so as not to aggravate relations. But he was preparing to give the “troika” a rebuff and began to give it on certain issues.”
One of these issues was the question of the monopoly of foreign trade. In November 1922, in the absence of Lenin and Trotsky, the Central Committee unanimously adopted a decision aimed at weakening this monopoly. Having learned that Trotsky was not present at the plenum and that he did not agree with by decision, Lenin entered into correspondence with him (five letters from Lenin to Trotsky on this issue were first published in the USSR only in 1965). As a result of the concerted actions of Lenin and Trotsky, a few weeks later the Central Committee reversed its decision as unanimously as it had previously adopted it. On this occasion, Lenin, who had already suffered a new blow, after which he was prohibited from correspondence, nevertheless dictated a letter to Trotsky to Krupskaya, which said: “It was as if it was possible to take the position without firing a single shot with a simple maneuvering movement. I propose not to stop and continue the offensive..."
At the end of November 1922, a conversation took place between Lenin and Trotsky, in which the latter raised the issue of the growth of apparatus bureaucracy. “Yes, our bureaucracy is monstrous,” Lenin picked up, “I was horrified after returning to work...” Trotsky added that he means not only state, but also party bureaucracy and that the essence of all difficulties, in his opinion, lies in the combination of state and party bureaucracy and in the mutual concealment of influential groups gathering around the hierarchy of party secretaries.
After listening to this, Lenin posed the question point blank: “So you propose to open a struggle not only against state bureaucracy, but also against the Organizing Bureau of the Central Committee?” The Organizing Bureau represented the very center of the Stalinist apparatus. Trotsky replied: “Perhaps it turns out like this.” “Well,” Lenin continued, clearly pleased that we had named the essence of the issue, “I propose to you a bloc: against bureaucracy in general, against the Organizing Bureau in particular.” "WITH good person flattering conclusion good block", Trotsky replied. In conclusion, it was agreed to meet some time later to discuss the organizational side of this issue. Previously, Lenin proposed creating a commission under the Central Committee to combat bureaucracy. “Essentially, this commission,” Trotsky recalled, “was supposed to become a lever for the destruction of the Stalinist faction, as the backbone of the bureaucracy...”
Immediately after this conversation, Trotsky conveyed its contents to his like-minded people - Rakovsky, I.N. Smirnov, Sosnovsky, Preobrazhensky and others. At the beginning of 1924, Trotsky told about this conversation to Averbakh (a young oppositionist who soon went over to the side of the ruling faction), who in turn conveyed the contents of this conversation to Yaroslavsky, and the latter apparently reported it to Stalin and the other triumvirs.
V.I. LENIN. LETTER TO THE CONGRESS
12/24/22 Under Sustainability Central Committee, which I spoke about above, I mean measures against a split, insofar as such measures can be taken at all. For, of course, the White Guard in “Russian Thought” (I think it was S.S. Oldenburg) was right when, firstly, he bet in relation to their game against Soviet Russia on the split of our party and when, secondly , staked this split on the most serious disagreements in the party.
Our party relies on two classes and therefore its instability is possible and its fall is inevitable if an agreement could not take place between these two classes. In this case, it is useless to take certain measures or even talk about the stability of our Central Committee. No measures in this case will be able to prevent a split. But I hope that this is too distant a future and too incredible an event to talk about.
I mean stability as a guarantee against splits in the near future, and I intend to examine here a number of considerations of a purely personal nature.
I think that the main ones on the issue of sustainability from this point of view are such members of the Central Committee as Stalin and Trotsky. The relations between them, in my opinion, constitute more than half the danger of that split, which could be avoided and the avoidance of which, in my opinion, should be served, among other things, by increasing the number of members of the Central Committee to 50, to 100 people.
Comrade Stalin, having become Secretary General, concentrated immense power in his hands, and I am not sure whether he will always be able to use this power carefully enough. On the other hand, Comrade Trotsky, as his struggle against the Central Committee in connection with the issue of the NKPS has already proven, is distinguished not only by his outstanding abilities. Personally, he is perhaps the most capable person in the present Central Committee, but he is also overly self-confident and overly enthusiastic about the purely administrative side of things. These two qualities of the two outstanding leaders of the modern Central Committee can inadvertently lead to a split, and if our party does not take measures to prevent this, then a split may occur unexpectedly. I will not further characterize other members of the Central Committee by their personal qualities. Let me just remind you that the October episode of Zinoviev and Kamenev, of course, was not an accident, but that it can just as little be blamed on them personally as non-Bolshevism was on Trotsky. Among the young members of the Central Committee, I would like to say a few words about Bukharin and Pyatakov. These, in my opinion, are the most outstanding forces (of the youngest forces), and regarding them one should keep in mind the following: Bukharin is not only the most valuable and greatest theoretician of the party, he is also rightfully considered the favorite of the entire party, but his theoretical views are very with doubt they can be classified as completely Marxist, because there is something scholastic in him (he never studied and, I think, never fully understood dialectics).
25.XII. Then Pyatakov is a man of undoubtedly outstanding will and outstanding abilities, but he is too keen on administration and the administrative side of things to be relied upon in a serious political matter. Of course, I make both of these remarks only for the present time, on the assumption that both of them outstanding and dedicated workers will not find an opportunity to replenish their knowledge and change their one-sidedness.
Lenin 25. XII. 22 Recorded by M.V.
Addendum to the letter dated December 24, 1922. Stalin is too rude, and this shortcoming, quite tolerable in the environment and in communications between us communists, becomes intolerable in the position of General Secretary. Therefore, I suggest that the comrades consider a way to move Stalin from this place and appoint another person to this place, who in all other respects differs from Comrade. Stalin has only one advantage, namely, more tolerant, more loyal, more polite and more attentive to his comrades, less capriciousness, etc. This circumstance may seem like an insignificant detail. But I think that from the point of view of protecting against a split and from the point of view of what I wrote above about the relationship between Stalin and Trotsky, this is not a trifle, or it is such a trifle that can become decisive.
Buying a higher education diploma means securing a happy and successful future for yourself. Nowadays, without documents of higher education you will not be able to get a job anywhere. Only with a diploma can you try to get into a place that will bring not only benefits, but also pleasure from the work performed. Financial and social success, high social status– that’s what having a higher education diploma brings.
Immediately after finishing their last school year, most of yesterday's students already firmly know which university they want to enroll in. But life is unfair, and situations are different. You may not get into your chosen and desired university, and other educational institutions seem unsuitable for a variety of reasons. Such a “trips” in life can knock any person out of the saddle. However, the desire to become successful does not go away.
The reason for the lack of a diploma may be the fact that you were unable to borrow budget place. Unfortunately, the cost of education, especially at a prestigious university, is very high, and prices are constantly creeping up. These days, not all families can pay for their children’s education. So a financial issue can also cause a lack of educational documents.
The same problems with money can become a reason for yesterday’s high school student to go to work in construction instead of university. If family circumstances suddenly change, for example, the breadwinner passes away, there will be nothing to pay for education, and the family needs something to live on.
It also happens that everything goes well, you manage to successfully enter a university and everything is fine with your studies, but love happens, a family is formed and you simply don’t have enough energy or time to study. In addition, it is necessary much more money, especially if a child appears in the family. Paying for tuition and supporting a family is extremely expensive and you have to sacrifice your diploma.
Obstacle to obtaining higher education It may also be that the university chosen for the specialty is located in another city, perhaps quite far from home. Studying there can be hampered by parents who do not want to let their child go, the fears that a young man who has just graduated from school may experience in front of an unknown future, or the same lack of necessary funds.
As you can see, there are a huge number of reasons for not getting the required diploma. However, the fact remains that without a diploma, counting on a well-paid and prestigious job is a waste of time. At this moment, the realization comes that it is necessary to somehow solve this issue and get out of the current situation. Anyone who has time, energy and money decides to go to university and get a diploma through the official route. Everyone else has two options - not to change anything in their lives and remain to vegetate on the outskirts of fate, and the second, more radical and courageous - to buy a specialist, bachelor's or master's degree. You can also purchase any document in Moscow
However, those people who want to get settled in life need a document that will be no different from the original document. That is why it is necessary to pay maximum attention to the choice of the company to which you will entrust the creation of your diploma. Take your choice with maximum responsibility, in this case you will have a great chance to successfully change the course of your life.
In this case, no one will ever be interested in the origin of your diploma - you will be assessed solely as a person and an employee.
Purchasing a diploma in Russia is very easy!
Our company successfully fulfills orders for a variety of documents - buy a certificate for 11 classes, order a college diploma or purchase a vocational school diploma and much more. Also on our website you can buy marriage and divorce certificates, order birth and death certificates. We carry out work in a short time, and undertake the creation of documents for urgent orders.
We guarantee that by ordering any documents from us, you will receive them on time, and the papers themselves will be of excellent quality. Our documents are no different from the originals, since we use only real GOZNAK forms. This is the same type of documents that an ordinary university graduate receives. Their complete identity guarantees your peace of mind and the ability to get any job without the slightest problem.
To place an order, you only need to clearly define your desires by selecting the desired type of university, specialty or profession, and also indicating correct year graduation from a higher educational institution. This will help confirm your story about your studies if you are asked about receiving your diploma.
Our company has been successfully working on creating diplomas for a long time, so it knows perfectly well how to prepare documents for different years of graduation. All our diplomas correspond to the smallest details with similar original documents. Confidentiality of your order is a law for us that we never violate.
We will quickly complete your order and deliver it to you just as quickly. To do this, we use the services of couriers (for delivery within the city) or transport companies that transport our documents throughout the country.
We are confident that the diploma purchased from us will be the best assistant in your future career.
Advantages of purchasing a diploma
Purchasing a diploma with entry into the register has the following advantages:
- Saving time for many years of training.
- The ability to acquire any higher education diploma remotely, even in parallel with studying at another university. You can have as many documents as you wish.
- A chance to indicate the desired grades in the “Appendix”.
- Saving a day on the purchase, while officially receiving a diploma with posting in St. Petersburg costs much more than a finished document.
- Official proof of higher education educational institution according to the specialty you need.
- Having a higher education in St. Petersburg will open all the roads for quick career advancement.
The first ruler of the young Country of Soviets, which arose as a result of the October Revolution of 1917, was the head of the RCP (b) - the Bolshevik Party - Vladimir Ulyanov (Lenin), who led the “revolution of workers and peasants”. All subsequent rulers of the USSR held the post of general secretary of the central committee of this organization, which, starting in 1922, became known as the CPSU - the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
Let us note that the ideology of the system ruling the country denied the possibility of holding any national elections or voting. The change of the highest leaders of the state was carried out by the ruling elite itself, either after the death of their predecessor, or as a result of coups, accompanied by serious internal party struggle. The article will list the rulers of the USSR in chronological order and the main stages are marked life path some of the most prominent historical figures.
Ulyanov (Lenin) Vladimir Ilyich (1870-1924)
One of the most famous figures in the history of Soviet Russia. Vladimir Ulyanov stood at the origins of its creation, was the organizer and one of the leaders of the event, which gave rise to the world's first communist state. Having led a coup in October 1917 aimed at overthrowing the provisional government, he took the post of chairman of the Council of People's Commissars - the post of leader new country, formed on the ruins of the Russian Empire.
His merit is considered to be the peace treaty of 1918 with Germany, which marked the end of the NEP - the government's new economic policy, which was supposed to lead the country out of the abyss of widespread poverty and hunger. All the rulers of the USSR considered themselves “faithful Leninists” and in every possible way praised Vladimir Ulyanov as a great statesman.
It should be noted that immediately after the “reconciliation with the Germans,” the Bolsheviks, under the leadership of Lenin, unleashed internal terror against dissent and the legacy of tsarism, which claimed millions of lives. The NEP policy also did not last long and was canceled shortly after his death, which occurred on January 21, 1924.
Dzhugashvili (Stalin) Joseph Vissarionovich (1879-1953)
Joseph Stalin became the first General Secretary in 1922. However, right up to the death of V.I. Lenin, he remained in the secondary leadership role of the state, inferior in popularity to his other comrades, who also aimed to become the rulers of the USSR. Nevertheless, after the death of the leader of the world proletariat, Stalin quickly eliminated his main opponents, accusing them of betraying the ideals of the revolution.
By the early 1930s, he became the sole leader of nations, capable of deciding the fate of millions of citizens with the stroke of a pen. His policy of forced collectivization and dispossession, which replaced the NEP, as well as mass repressions against people dissatisfied with the current government, claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of USSR citizens. However, the period of Stalin’s reign is noticeable not only in its bloody trail, it is also worth noting positive points his leadership. In a short time, the Union turned from a country with a third-rate economy into a powerful industrial power that won the battle against fascism.
After the end of the Great Patriotic War many cities in the western part of the USSR, destroyed almost to the ground, were quickly restored, and their industry began to work even more efficiently. The rulers of the USSR, who held the highest position after Joseph Stalin, denied his leading role in the development of the state and characterized his reign as a period of the cult of the leader’s personality.
Khrushchev Nikita Sergeevich (1894-1971)
Coming from a simple peasant family, N.S. Khrushchev took the helm of the party soon after Stalin’s death, which occurred. During the first years of his reign, he waged a behind-the-scenes struggle with G.M. Malenkov, who held the post of Chairman of the Council of Ministers and was the de facto leader of the state.
In 1956, Khrushchev read a report at the 20th Party Congress on Stalin's repressions, condemning the actions of his predecessor. The reign of Nikita Sergeevich was marked by the development of the space program - the launch of an artificial satellite and the first human flight into space. His new one allowed many citizens of the country to move from cramped communal apartments to more comfortable separate housing. The houses that were built en masse at that time are still popularly called “Khrushchev buildings.”
Brezhnev Leonid Ilyich (1907-1982)
On October 14, 1964, N. S. Khrushchev was removed from his post by a group of members of the Central Committee under the leadership of L. I. Brezhnev. For the first time in the history of the state, the rulers of the USSR were replaced in order not after the death of the leader, but as a result of an internal party conspiracy. The Brezhnev era in Russian history is known as stagnation. The country stopped developing and began to lose to the leading world powers, lagging behind them in all sectors, excluding military-industrial.
Brezhnev made some attempts to improve relations with the United States, which were damaged in 1962, when N.S. Khrushchev ordered the deployment of missiles with nuclear warheads in Cuba. Agreements were signed with the American leadership that limited the arms race. However, all the efforts of L.I. Brezhnev to defuse the situation were canceled out by the introduction of troops into Afghanistan.
Andropov Yuri Vladimirovich (1914-1984)
After Brezhnev's death on November 10, 1982, his place was taken by Yu. Andropov, who had previously headed the KGB - the USSR State Security Committee. He set a course for reforms and transformations in the social and economic spheres. His reign was marked by the initiation of criminal cases exposing corruption in government circles. However, Yuri Vladimirovich did not have time to make any changes in the life of the state, as he had serious health problems and died on February 9, 1984.
Chernenko Konstantin Ustinovich (1911-1985)
Since February 13, 1984, he held the post of General Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee. He continued the policy of his predecessor to expose corruption in the echelons of power. He was very ill and died in 1985, having held the highest government post for just over a year. All past rulers of the USSR, according to the order established in the state, were buried with K.U. Chernenko was the last on this list.
Gorbachev Mikhail Sergeevich (1931)
M. S. Gorbachev is the most famous Russian politician the end of the twentieth century. He won love and popularity in the West, but his rule evokes ambivalent feelings among the citizens of his country. If Europeans and Americans call him a great reformer, many people in Russia consider him the destroyer of the Soviet Union. Gorbachev proclaimed domestic economic and political reforms, carried out under the slogan “Perestroika, Glasnost, Acceleration!”, which led to massive shortages of food and industrial goods, unemployment and a drop in the standard of living of the population.
To assert that the era of M. S. Gorbachev’s reign had only negative consequences for the life of our country, it will be wrong. In Russia, the concepts of a multi-party system, freedom of religion and press appeared. For his foreign policy, Gorbachev was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. The rulers of the USSR and Russia, neither before nor after Mikhail Sergeevich, were awarded such an honor.
General Secretaries (General Secretaries) of the USSR... Once upon a time, their faces were known to almost every resident of our huge country. Today they are only part of history. Each of these political figures committed actions and deeds that were assessed later, and not always positively. It should be noted that the general secretaries were chosen not by the people, but by the ruling elite. In this article we will present a list of general secretaries of the USSR (with photos) in chronological order.
J.V. Stalin (Dzhugashvili)
This politician was born in the Georgian city of Gori on December 18, 1879 in the family of a shoemaker. In 1922, while V.I. was still alive. Lenin (Ulyanov), he was appointed first general secretary. It is he who heads the list of general secretaries of the USSR in chronological order. However, it should be noted that while Lenin was alive, Joseph Vissarionovich played a secondary role in governing the state. After the death of the “leader of the proletariat,” a serious struggle broke out for the highest government post. Numerous competitors of I.V. Dzhugashvili had every chance of taking this post. But thanks to uncompromising and sometimes even harsh actions and political intrigues, Stalin emerged victorious from the game and managed to establish a regime of personal power. Let us note that most of the applicants were simply physically destroyed, and the rest were forced to leave the country. In a fairly short period of time, Stalin managed to take the country into a tight grip. In the early thirties, Joseph Vissarionovich became the sole leader of the people.
The policy of this USSR Secretary General went down in history:
- mass repressions;
- collectivization;
- total dispossession.
In the 37-38 years of the last century, mass terror was carried out, in which the number of victims reached 1,500,000 people. In addition, historians blame Joseph Vissarionovich for his policy of forced collectivization, mass repressions that occurred in all layers of society, and the forced industrialization of the country. On domestic policy Some character traits of the leader affected the country:
- sharpness;
- thirst for unlimited power;
- high self-esteem;
- intolerance of other people's judgment.
Personality cult
Photos of the Secretary General of the USSR, as well as other leaders who have ever held this post, can be found in the presented article. We can say with confidence that Stalin’s personality cult had a very tragic impact on the fate of millions of the most different people: scientific and creative intelligentsia, government and party leaders, military.
For all this, during the Thaw, Joseph Stalin was branded by his followers. But not all the leader’s actions are reprehensible. According to historians, there are also moments for which Stalin deserves praise. Of course, the most important thing is the victory over fascism. In addition, there was a fairly rapid transformation of the destroyed country into an industrial and even military giant. There is an opinion that if it were not for Stalin’s personality cult, which is now condemned by everyone, many achievements would have been impossible. The death of Joseph Vissarionovich occurred on March 5, 1953. Let's look at all the general secretaries of the USSR in order.
N. S. Khrushchev
Nikita Sergeevich was born in the Kursk province on April 15, 1894, into an ordinary working-class family. He took part in the civil war on the side of the Bolsheviks. He was a member of the CPSU since 1918. At the end of the thirties, he was appointed secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine. Nikita Sergeevich headed the Soviet Union some time after the death of Stalin. It should be said that he had to compete for this post with G. Malenkov, who chaired the Council of Ministers and at that time was actually the leader of the country. But still, the leading role went to Nikita Sergeevich.
During the reign of Khrushchev N.S. as Secretary General of the USSR in the country:
- The first man was launched into space, and all sorts of developments in this area took place.
- A huge part of the fields were planted with corn, thanks to which Khrushchev was nicknamed the “corn farmer.”
- During his reign, active construction of five-story buildings began, which later became known as “Khrushchev buildings.”
Khrushchev became one of the initiators of the “thaw” in foreign and domestic policy, the rehabilitation of victims of repression. This politician an unsuccessful attempt was made to modernize the party-state system. He also announced a significant improvement (on a par with capitalist countries) in living conditions for the Soviet people. At the XX and XXII Congresses of the CPSU, in 1956 and 1961. accordingly, he spoke harshly about the activities of Joseph Stalin and his cult of personality. However, the construction of a nomenklatura regime in the country, the forceful dispersal of demonstrations (in 1956 - in Tbilisi, in 1962 - in Novocherkassk), the Berlin (1961) and Caribbean (1962) crises, the aggravation of relations with China, the building of communism by 1980 and the well-known political call to “catch up and overtake America!” - all this made Khrushchev’s policy inconsistent. And on October 14, 1964, Nikita Sergeevich was relieved of his position. Khrushchev died on September 11, 1971, after a long illness.
L. I. Brezhnev
The third in order on the list of general secretaries of the USSR is L. I. Brezhnev. Born in the village of Kamenskoye in the Dnepropetrovsk region on December 19, 1906. Member of the CPSU since 1931. He took the position of General Secretary as a result of a conspiracy. Leonid Ilyich was the leader of a group of members of the Central Committee (Central Committee) that removed Nikita Khrushchev. The era of Brezhnev's rule in the history of our country is characterized as stagnation. This happened for the following reasons:
- except for the military-industrial sphere, the country's development was stopped;
- Soviet Union began to lag significantly behind Western countries;
- Repression and persecution began again, people again felt the grip of the state.
Note that during the reign of this politician there were both negative and favorable sides. At the very beginning of his reign, Leonid Ilyich played positive role in the life of the state. He curtailed all the unreasonable undertakings created by Khrushchev in the economic sphere. In the first years of Brezhnev's rule, enterprises were given more independence, material incentives, and the number of planned indicators was reduced. Brezhnev tried to establish good relationship with the USA, but he never succeeded. But after the introduction of Soviet troops into Afghanistan, this became impossible.
Period of stagnation
By the late 70s - early 80s, Brezhnev's circle was more concerned about their own clan interests and often ignored the interests of the state as a whole. The politician’s inner circle pleased the sick leader in everything and awarded him orders and medals. The reign of Leonid Ilyich lasted for 18 years, he was in power the longest, with the exception of Stalin. The eighties in the Soviet Union are characterized as a “period of stagnation.” Although, after the devastation of the 90s, it is increasingly presented as a period of peace, state power, prosperity and stability. Most likely, these opinions have a right to be, because the entire Brezhnev period of rule is heterogeneous in nature. L.I. Brezhnev held his position until November 10, 1982, until his death.
Yu. V. Andropov
This politician spent less than 2 years as Secretary General of the USSR. Yuri Vladimirovich was born into the family of a railway worker on June 15, 1914. His homeland is the Stavropol Territory, the city of Nagutskoye. Party member since 1939. Thanks to the fact that the politician led active work, he climbed the career ladder quite quickly. At the time of Brezhnev’s death, Yuri Vladimirovich headed the Committee state security.
He was nominated for the post of General Secretary by his comrades. Andropov set himself the task of reforming the Soviet state, trying to prevent the impending socio-economic crisis. But, unfortunately, I didn’t have time. During the reign of Yuri Vladimirovich, special attention was paid to labor discipline in the workplace. While serving as Secretary General of the USSR, Andropov opposed the numerous privileges that were provided to employees of the state and party apparatus. Andropov showed this by personal example, refusing most of them. After his death on February 9, 1984 (due to a long illness), this politician was least criticized and most of all aroused public support.
K. U. Chernenko
On September 24, 1911, Konstantin Chernenko was born into a peasant family in the Yeisk province. He has been in the ranks of the CPSU since 1931. He was appointed to the position of General Secretary on February 13, 1984, immediately after Yu.V. Andropova. While governing the state, he continued the policies of his predecessor. He served as Secretary General for about a year. The death of the politician occurred on March 10, 1985, the cause was a serious illness.
M.S. Gorbachev
The politician's date of birth was March 2, 1931; his parents were simple peasants. Gorbachev’s homeland is the village of Privolnoye in the North Caucasus. He joined the ranks of the Communist Party in 1952. He acted as an active public figure, so he quickly moved up the party line. Mikhail Sergeevich completes the list of general secretaries of the USSR. He was appointed to this position on March 11, 1985. Later he became the only and last president of the USSR. The era of his reign went down in history with the policy of “perestroika”. It provided for the development of democracy, the introduction of openness, and the provision of economic freedom to the people. These reforms of Mikhail Sergeevich led to mass unemployment, a total shortage of goods and the liquidation of a huge number of state-owned enterprises.
Collapse of the Union
During the reign of this politician, the USSR collapsed. All fraternal republics of the Soviet Union declared their independence. It should be noted that in the West, M. S. Gorbachev is considered perhaps the most respected Russian politician. Mikhail Sergeevich has Nobel Prize peace. Gorbachev served as General Secretary until August 24, 1991. He headed the Soviet Union until December 25 of the same year. In 2018, Mikhail Sergeevich turned 87 years old.
This now almost unused abbreviation was once known to every child and was pronounced almost with reverence. Central Committee of the CPSU! What do these letters mean?
About the name
The abbreviation we are interested in means, or more simply, Central Committee. Considering the importance of the Communist Party in society, its governing body could well be called the kitchen in which fateful decisions for the country were “cooked.” Members of the CPSU Central Committee, the main elite of the country, are the “cooks” in this kitchen, and the “chef” is the General Secretary.
From the history of the CPSU
The history of this public entity began long before the revolution and the proclamation of the USSR. Until 1952, its names changed several times: RCP(b), VKP(b). These abbreviations reflected both the ideology, which was clarified each time (from workers' social democracy to the Bolshevik Communist Party), and the scale (from Russian to all-Union). But the names are not the point. From the 20s to the 90s of the last century, a one-party system functioned in the country, and the Communist Party had a complete monopoly. The Constitution of 1936 recognized it as the governing core, and in the main law of the country of 1977 it was even proclaimed the guiding and guiding force of society. Any directives issued by the CPSU Central Committee instantly acquired the force of law.
All this, of course, did not contribute to the democratic development of the country. In the USSR, inequality of rights along party lines was actively promoted. Even small leadership positions could only be applied for by members of the CPSU, who could be held accountable for mistakes along party lines. One of the most terrible punishments was deprivation of a party card. The CPSU positioned itself as a party of workers and collective farmers, so there were quite strict quotas for its recruitment with new members. It was difficult for a representative of a creative profession or a mental worker to find himself in the party ranks; The CPSU monitored its national composition no less strictly. Thanks to this selection, the really best did not always end up in the party.
From the party charter
In accordance with the Charter, all activities of the Communist Party were collegial. In primary organizations, decisions were made at general meetings, but in general the governing body was a congress held every few years. A party plenum was held approximately every six months. In the intervals between plenums and congresses, the Central Committee of the CPSU was the leading unit responsible for all party activities. In turn, supreme body, which led the Central Committee itself, was the Politburo, headed by the General (First) Secretary.
In number functional responsibilities Central Committee included personnel policy and local control, expenditure of the party budget and management of the activities of public structures. But not only that. Together with the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee, he determined all ideological activities in the country and resolved the most important political and economic issues.
It is difficult for people who have not lived to understand this. IN democratic country where a number of parties operate, their activities are of little concern to the common man - he remembers them only before the elections. But in the USSR the leading role of the Communist Party was even emphasized constitutionally! In factories and collective farms, in military units and in creative groups, the party organizer was the second (and in importance often the first) leader of this structure. Formally, the Communist Party could not manage economic or political processes: This is why the Council of Ministers existed. But in fact, the Communist Party decided everything. No one was surprised by the fact that the most important political problems and five-year plans for economic development were discussed and determined by party congresses. The Central Committee of the CPSU directed all these processes.
About the main person in the party
Theoretically, the Communist Party was a democratic entity: from the time of Lenin until the last moment, there was no unity of command in it, and there were no formal leaders. It was assumed that the secretary of the Central Committee was just a technical position, and the members of the governing body were equal. The first secretaries of the CPSU Central Committee, or rather the RCP(b), were indeed not very noticeable figures. E. Stasova, Y. Sverdlov, N. Krestinsky, V. Molotov - although their names were well-known, their relationship to practical guide these people didn't have. But with the arrival of I. Stalin, the process went differently: the “father of nations” managed to crush all power under himself. A corresponding position also appeared - Secretary General. It must be said that the names of party leaders changed periodically: the General Secretaries were replaced by the First Secretaries of the CPSU Central Committee, then vice versa. WITH light hand Stalin, regardless of the title of his position, the party leader at the same time became the main person of the state.
After the death of the leader in 1953, N. Khrushchev and L. Brezhnev held this post, then for a short period the position was occupied by Yu. Andropov and K. Chernenko. The last party leader was M. Gorbachev, who was also the only President of the USSR. The era of each of them was significant in its own way. If Stalin is considered by many to be a tyrant, then Khrushchev is usually called a voluntarist, and Brezhnev is the father of stagnation. Gorbachev went down in history as the man who first destroyed and then buried a huge state - the Soviet Union.
Conclusion
The history of the CPSU was an academic discipline compulsory for all universities in the country, and every schoolchild in the Soviet Union knew the main milestones in the development and activities of the party. Revolution, then civil war, industrialization and collectivization, victory over fascism and the post-war restoration of the country. And then virgin lands and space flights, large-scale all-Union construction projects - the history of the party was closely intertwined with the history of the state. In each case, the role of the CPSU was considered dominant, and the word “communist” was synonymous with a true patriot and simply a worthy person.
But if you read the history of the party differently, between the lines, you get a terrible thriller. Millions of repressed people, exiled peoples, camps and political murders, reprisals against undesirables, persecution of dissidents... We can say that the author of every black page of Soviet history is the CPSU Central Committee.
In the USSR they loved to quote Lenin’s words: “The party is the mind, honor and conscience of our era.” Alas! In fact, the Communist Party was neither one nor the other, nor the third. After the 1991 coup, the activities of the CPSU in Russia were banned. Is the Russian Communist Party the successor to the All-Union Party? Even experts find it difficult to explain this.
