• Interior
• Windows
• Walls
• Projects
• Buildings

How to discreetly shoot under a skirt. Look up your skirt: the digital revolution is in full swing

People often write to me asking “how do you shoot?” and so on... I answer everyone as much as possible, but I have already begun to repeat myself too often. I decided to make a tag “”, where I will try to answer the questions that my viewers and readers have.

magnetic8999 asks:

• I really like your posts and the way you shoot videos and take photos. I would like to ask in which groups do you still post to watch?
  1. All my work is available here - if you look for the only source where you can see all my posts - this is my blog :) I publish in other communities insofar as, with an eye to the rules of these communities and so on. And so -
  2. communities "Stranger" and "Tights Magazine" in LiveJournal
  3. My works (though not all) are also in the “PhotoMafia” forum of the SexNarod website
  4. I recently wrote about “Domik”, but the local administration asked me not to advertise the link to it, which I do. IN in some cases I can send you a link to the House privately
  5. My erotic stories on the website "Stool" can be read at this link
  6. My channel is on YouTube(they don’t allow me to post upskirt there, they swear)
  7. My channel on Vimeo (where I will post everything that YouTube does not allow)
  8. I also once published on a website for frottage lovers (something for me lately Somehow I’m not getting along with frottage, either there are fewer people on the subway, or I’m going at the wrong time - that’s why there are no stories yet)
• and I would also like to shoot a video under a skirt. I would like some advice on what is the best way to shoot and how to hide the camera? Thanks in advance.
  • Interesting question :) In fact, use your imagination. Once upon a time (in the late 90s), asking myself the same question, I watched the film “The Mask” with Jim Carrey and Cameron Diaz and the answer was found. Exactly there.
  1. A video camera was taken. At that time they were huge compared to modern ones.
  2. A bag with a long strap was taken, into which this camera would fit, but at the same time - almost end-to-end.
  3. Two small slot-like holes were cut in the bottom of the bag, through which thin slings (which are used to make backpack straps) were passed.
  4. With these straps, the camera was fixed (tied) at the bottom of the bag, tightly pressed by the lens to one wall of the bag, so that even if the bag was turned upside down, the camera would not change its position inside.
  5. A hole with a minimum diameter was cut in the side wall of the bag, opposite the camera lens, so that only the edges of the hole would not fit into the frame. (in later versions of the bag, I sewed a piece on the outside of this hole from the same material as the bag, so that when the bag was worn normally, the hole would be closed and would not attract attention even with a close inspection of the bag, but when it was necessary to remove it, the hole would easily open) .
  6. Well, then you just walk in places where there are a lot of pretty girls (the main rule is that everything beautiful on the outside and under the skirt will be beautiful).
  7. Decide in advance those places where girls stop for a while and next to which you will not stand out (a checkpoint with a turnstile, a store with food (but not with lingerie or jewelry), an ice cream kiosk).
  8. Tracking potential candidates throughout the entire radius around you - see which one is heading to the “stopping point” - follow her.
  9. Shoot from the shoulder while she is walking, or while she is not standing still.
  10. When you stop, you can carefully, but without hiding, remove the bag from your shoulder, supposedly so as not to push anyone with it, and by pulling one end of the belt, lift the side of the bag with the hole up. (it’s worth rehearsing at home, on a mop, for example, in order to notice at what angle of the bag the most interesting thing gets into the frame - I had special marks embroidered with black thread on the belt of the bag, so they were not visible, but I knew for sure by touch , at what angle the bag is tilted)

• Some safety tips:

1. Always carry documents with you, in case you come into contact with the police (not even in case you are “caught,” but simply a police squad may be interested in why you are hanging around here and will check your documents).
2. Be prepared for the worst possible outcome - she spotted it, started screaming, and the boys jumped out of a nearby jeep and swept away. I've never had anything like this. But one day a colleague burned me with my bag at work. I referred to the fact that I simply have a form of mental illness, the doctors say - nothing dangerous for society and so on. He looked at me strangely, but fell behind and did not develop the topic.
3. The topic of schizophrenia, and in spring and autumn also seasonal exacerbation - the best excuse for everything in general :)
4. Don't use expensive camera- God forbid you break it yourself or someone else will help you - it will be offensive. A low-end camera is sufficient. If only I could film it.
5. Be careful who you photograph. If a girl is nervous, in a hurry, constantly adjusting herself, pulling down her skirt, looking around, it’s better to leave her alone. Even if you manage to get close to her and start filming, it is very likely that she will “burn” you, just because she suspects everyone and everything around her of everything. I was once “burned” like that, as it turned out later - she considered me a pickpocket. It’s better to leave them alone and admire them from afar. There are many more girls who dress beautifully, are confident, behave calmly, bend over and squat "with taste" - they are your best catch. I have had cases when representatives of this category of girls even started posing when they saw the camera.
6. It's better to shoot where the floor is light shades(including dry asphalt) - do not forget that the camera films where there is quite a bit of daylight and you can only rely on reflected light.
7. It is better not to photograph children and teenagers. It's ugly in every sense of the word. And children are children. They just don’t understand that you can shoot like that. They are forgiven. And it’s simply not nice to use it, it’s not fair.
8. Remember - by filming, you are not breaking the law. You have a constitutional right to take photos and videos almost everywhere. You are breaking the law when you publish what you have filmed. And then - with big reservations. As you can see, for example, I publish material filmed more than 10 years ago.

The revolution that digital technologies brought to our lives thirty years ago did not end (relatively speaking) with the advent of the Pentium. It continues - and every year new inconsistencies, inconsistencies, bottlenecks emerge in culture, traditions, law, not adapted to the new - digital ones! - realities.

Often such inconsistencies are serious and give rise to long, heated debates: such as the problem of the inability to control digital copying (remember Salinger's dilemma). But there are also seemingly little things that are not even possible to discuss normally. Yes, they demonstrate in their purest form how technology is ahead of the law, but touch on such a topic even in passing - and you are guaranteed at least a condescending smile from your listeners. And discuss this on television, in the press?! Well, you know! An example of such a “trifle” is the upskirt phenomenon.

I see, I see, the one who is in the subject began to smile :-). To be honest, this thing is very popular in certain circles. If by some miracle you don’t know what we’re talking about, then it’s simple: the word “upskirt” is translated from English as “peeping under a skirt” and is used to refer to both the actual action and the resulting photographs or videos. Its history is rich and extends far beyond the digital age. There is Marilyn dancing over a well, and frivolous paintings by medieval painters, and much more.

In the context of our conversation, two points are important. Firstly, there has always been a tangible element of eroticism in upskirt. Secondly, from the point of view of society, this has always been fun on the edge of what is acceptable, something between a game permitted for adults and generally accepted deviations like spying on someone taking a bath. The sexual revolution that happened in the second half of the 20th century (you know, “mini” and all that) even made the upskirt a fashion item. But hardly anyone could have imagined that at the beginning of the 21st century, thanks to digital technology, skirt peeping would turn from fun into a headache.

Annoys English term? I admit, I myself am not delighted with it. And while I was preparing the material, I almost broke my head, thinking about how best to translate it into Russian, and consulted with a linguist. Ideally, you need the same catchy, short, self-explanatory word. But even in the Russian-language section of Wikipedia there is no article on this topic (I’ll add a column and get started - join us!), so, for lack of a better one, I decided to use the direct transliterated version: apskirt. Not everyone will like it, but we are no strangers to the tablet and Satoshi ;-).

Something else is more important again. Upskirt in its modern sense is the child of camera phones and smartphones. The emergence of super-compact digital cameras, and even crossed with mobile phone, has become a kind of feature: such cameras are invisible, do not arouse suspicion, and make distributing the footage as easy as possible. As a result, skirt peeping has degenerated into a criminal business and unpleasant antisocial activity. Today, upskirting is one of the most popular categories on pornographic resources: there are providers of such content who provide a continuous stream of photos and videos from the streets, shopping centers, beaches, and there are consumers willing to pay for it. There are also plenty of “amateurs” sharing the results of their “works” on the Internet - and also putting random people they meet in an awkward position. I guess few girls dream of seeing themselves captured from below on YouTube. And the question is whether we can do anything against the invasion of privacy from this side.

To us, citizens Russian Federation, oddly enough, it is easier than for many others: covert filming in any form is outlawed in our country (correct me if something has changed). But the rest of the democratic world, alternating abuse with laughter, is forced to look for more precise and subtle formulations.

Americans are having a particularly hard time right now. Another scandal is raging in the States (they hope that this will be the last), connected precisely with upskirting. The backstory is simple and already typical: in 2010, in the Boston subway, a man was seen trying to take pictures on his phone - of course, without permission or knowledge - of fellow travelers from below, with an emphasis on the hips and crotch (sorry, that’s how it is in court documents). The police organized live bait fishing, sending disguised female employees out for a ride, the man took the bait and they tied him up (Michael Robertson, 31 years old). Soon the first trial took place and found the man guilty. It is not surprising: after all, voyeurism - that is, (I quote) the deliberate filming of the intimate areas of a partially or completely naked person without her consent at a time when the person assumes privacy - is illegal in the United States. But this was only the beginning of the story, the first iteration, if you like.

In the photo from the police station, Robertson is an ordinary middle-aged white guy. We do not know whether he was, as they say, a pervert or a cyber activist who, by his example, wanted to point out the inconsistency of the legal system with the actual state of affairs - well, just like the ever-memorable Aaron Schwartz. But, one way or another, Robertson really helped! He appealed and just won!

How did he do it? The highest court of the state where the hearings took place (Massachusetts) found that, being in public place, a citizen has no right to hope for privacy, and besides, cannot be considered even partially naked: he is dressed! A subway car is not a bathroom or a changing room, and a smartphone is not a hidden camera. And in general, if a citizen exposes parts of his body (intentionally or not), what kind of expectation of privacy can we talk about? Therefore, although voyeurism in the classical sense is still prohibited, this prohibition does not apply to upskirt.

After such a verdict, natural hysteria erupted in the media. Everyone laughs: some covertly, some openly; lawyers, passers-by, TV presenters and the press laugh. They laugh and make salty jokes like whether Robertson's lawyer was wearing panties when she talked about her client's "constitutional right to take upskirt pictures in public places"? And everyone understands that it will not be possible to laugh at the problem - and some, through tears of laughter, are already demanding improvements to the law, which is so far behind technology. But the trouble is, it is unclear what the final wording should be.

One option: at least over your clothes a person in a public place cannot expect privacy, under clothes he still expects her, and the invasion there should be prohibited. The definition is casuistic and not without flaws, but that’s the point: numbers A civilization has stepped on another callus - and no one knows how to get rid of the pain!

Naturally, the unfortunate inhabitants of Boston are not the only ones who are faced with this. Other American states suffer from the same “hole” in the law and have already acquitted citizens caught upskirting. Why America, everyone is trying their best. Japan does not prohibit covert filming, but it does limit the distribution of materials obtained in this way. Shaky. The UK looks at the problem rather with a grin, which is why especially celebrities suffer greatly - for whom the paparazzi have not yet put the lens between their legs. Nothing good either. India and Singapore are stupidly imprisoning upskirt lovers. Roughly: what if it was an accident?

In short, it is impossible to prohibit, it is more expensive to ignore, it is both scary and funny to discuss. This is such an awkward moment. One thing is good: instead of boring faces decorating materials about other clashes of numbers s and society, there are beautiful legs here. Enjoy while you can! 🙂

St. Petersburg student and model Anna Dovgalyuk recorded a video manifesto against “upskirts.” According to her, men often look under the skirts of girls on public transport, thereby committing a sexual crime. To draw attention to the problem, the girl in the video herself shows passers-by her charms under her dress.

According to Dovgalyuk, in less than a year in St. Petersburg, activists received more than 350 complaints from victims of such voyeurism, which is called upskirting and is “an element of large-scale disrespect for women.”

Perverts, as stated in the video, not only look up skirts, but also take pictures on their phones, and post the recordings, in which the faces of the victims are visible, on the Internet.

To draw attention to this problem, a girl who studies at the Faculty of Law and calls herself a social activist decided to “take it out” on those who like to look under skirts. Armed with a camera, Anna and her friends went down to the St. Petersburg metro. In the video, the activist, wearing a short red dress, lifts her hem every time passengers begin to exit the carriages. The footage changes every second - Anna's black panties were seen by passengers from several stations at once.

The video ends with a call to “legally recognize upskirting as a crime against the person.”

The video, which has already collected more than a million views on YouTube in just a few days, has caused mixed reactions. In the comments to the video, some users expressed bewilderment at such a manifesto. Most Commentators did not appreciate Dovgalyuk’s action.

“Complete nonsense, 350 complaints. And the girl showed her loin to thousands. And what was this supposed to give to people from the outside? Will the manifesto against rapists be in the form of porn?” - commentators are perplexed.

State Duma deputy Vitaly Milonov also spoke on Facebook about the solo action of a female lawyer, calling her an “idiot.”

The network found out that the activist is no stranger to being naked. On Instagram, the girl willingly shares pictures in swimsuits and underwear.